Find Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Find Us on Flickr Find Us on Youtube Bookmark & Share Subscribe to Feed
News24 – Breaking News, Latest News | News24, Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from dailymail,nytimes, sky news, BBC News

Abdel Hakim Belhaj torture case may be heard in secret court


Claim against Jack Straw, brought by Gaddafi victim and his wife, may be heard in secret under new Justice and Security Act

One of the first cases to be heard by the government's new generation of secret courts may be a claim brought by a Libyan dissident who was kidnapped along with his pregnant wife and flown to one of Muammar Gaddafi's prisons.

Abdel Hakim Belhaj is suing the former foreign secretary Jack Straw and Sir Mark Allen, former head of counter-terrorism at MI6, as well as the British government and its intelligence agencies, over the so-called extraordinary rendition operation from 2004.

The high court in London heard on Tuesday that ministers would probably move to have the case heard under the secrecy provisions of the controversial Justice and Security Act, which comes into force in July.

"The new act will apply to these proceedings," Rory Phillips QC, representing the government, told the court at a preliminary hearing. "It is likely that such an application will be made."

The act has faced criticism from lawyers and human rights groups who argue that its primary intention is not to protect intelligence-sharing arrangements with foreign states – as ministers argued when it was passing through parliament – but to conceal evidence of government wrongdoing in cases such as that brought by Belhaj.

Straw, Allen and the government face claims for damages from Belhaj and his wife, Fatima Bouchar, who accuse them of false imprisonment, conspiracy to injure and trespass to person, misfeasance in public office and negligence.

Richard Hermer QC, prosecuting, said that there was likely to be a lively debate between the two sides over the circumstances in which the secrecy provisions of the act could be relied upon by the government.

Phillips made clear, however, that the defendants were keen to reach a negotiated settlement with Belhaj.

"They would be pleased to enter into a settlement process to draw a line under this case," he said.

"The defendants would like to reiterate … their willingness to sit down with Mr Belhaj and his representatives, face to face, in order to see if we can reach a settlement."

Belhaj and Bouchar's lawyers believe the pair has a strong case, based in part on a secret intelligence file discovered by the New York-based NGO Human Rights Watch during the revolution that toppled Gaddafi.

The file contained a number of letters from Allen to the dictator's intelligence chief, Moussa Koussa, including one in which the MI6 officer made clear that although he did not pay for the air cargo, the intelligence that had led to the couple being detained and "rendered" had originated with his agency.

Other documents discovered at the time showed that MI6 was involved in a second operation in which another Libyan dissident, Sami al-Saadi, was kidnapped and flown to Tripoli along with his wife and four children, the youngest a six-year-old girl. Al-Saadi settled his claim against the British government with a payment of £2.2m.

Belhaj has offered to settle his claim with a payment of just £1 from each of the defendants, but insists that they must admit their guilt and apologise to him, and particularly to his wife.

Despite being visibly pregnant, Bouchar was allegedly chained to a wall when detained by the CIA in Bangkok before being taped head and foot to a stretcher for the 17-hour flight to Tripoli. She was then held for several months while her husband was being interrogated and allegedly tortured nearby.

Such an apology is unlikely to be forthcoming, however, as the two UK-Libyan rendition operations are the subject of a Scotland Yard investigation – one of four police investigations into the activities of British intelligence officers in the years after 9/11.

The high court case was adjourned until October, when the government will argue that the case cannot be tried in an English court, as the events took place outside the UK, and involved foreign intelligence officers.

Were this to be accepted by the courts, Hermer argued, "then whenever agents of the British state are involved in joint operations with agents of a foreign state, they enjoy complete immunity".

The kidnap, torture and arbitrary detention that the couple suffered were offences not only in English law, but "fundamental breaches of international law".

Straw and Allen are also arguing that they are unable to respond to the allegations because of the restraints of the Official Secrets Act.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    


Iran election: Rafsanjani blocked from running for president


List of eight candidates allowed to run in race to succeed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad excludes two leading figures

Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the leading opposition-backed candidate in Iran's presidential election, was disqualified on Tuesday from standing in a blow to those hoping for significant change when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad leaves office.

Iranian state-run television broadcast a statement by the interior ministry on Tuesday night announcing the final list of candidates. It did not include Rafsanjani or President Ahmadinejad's close ally, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei.

Eight men were allowed to enter the race for the election on 14 June, including Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili; the mayor of Tehran, Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf; and former foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati. Hassan Rouhani, a reformist who is seen as having little chance of victory, was also allowed to run. Jalili is widely seen as the favourite candidate of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

More than 680 people, among them some 40 prominent figures, registered as potential candidates this month in the hope of succeeding Ahmadinejad, but the six clergymen and six jurists of the Guardian Council allowed only a handful to stand.

The council's spokesman, Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei, said on Tuesday the vetting process had ended and the final list of candidates had been sent to the interior ministry but did not name those qualified, the semi-official Isna news agency reported. The candidates were then announced on national TV.

Conservative websites and semi-official agencies had earlier reported that Rafsanjani, 78, who has won the support of the country's reformers, had been disqualified because he is seen as too feeble to govern the country. His supporters said the reports amounted to no more than rumours spread by rival camps.

"If an individual who wants to take up a high post can only perform a few hours of work each day, naturally that person cannot be confirmed," Kadkhodaei said earlierthis week, boosting speculation that Rafsanjani would be blocked. Two of the Guardian Council's 12 members are older than Rafsanjani.

The hardline Kayhan newspaper, whose director is appointed by Khamenei, ran an editorial on Tuesday calling on the Guardian Council to disqualify Rafsanjani, saying he had become the favourite candidate of the country's enemies and opposition.

"A divine and serious responsibility rests on the shoulders of the Guardian Council. It is to rescue Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani from a dangerous bait that has been set for him by foreign enemies and their domestic associates," wrote Kayhan's Hossein Shariatmadari. Rafsanjani's office fought back by issuing a statement saying his opponents had resorted to fabricating news in order to distort the old man's image.

Rafsanjani's disqualification would come as a surprise to many of his supporters, who thought it unlikely the Guardian Council would reject him, given his crucial role in founding the Islamic republic and his position as one of the country's great political survivors.

Ali Motahari, an influential MP who was appointed on Tuesday as head of a major campaign group supporting Rafsanjani, predicted that Khamenei might intervene to reinstate Rafsanjani.

"Rafsanjani played a significant role in founding the Islamic republic … His disqualification will call into question the very principles of our revolution and the principles of the ruling system of the Islamic republic," he told the semi-official Isna news agency. Rafsanjani is head of Iran's expediency council, which mediates between the parliament and the Guardian Council.

Mashaei, who is seen as a nationalist figure, was widely expected to be barred despite Ahmadinejad's unwavering support. Supporters of Khamenei have accused Mashaei of putting Iran ahead of Islam and not showing enough loyalty to the supreme leader.

The Iran News Network, a pro-Ahmadinejad website, reported on Monday that a group of activists and campaigners sympathetic to Mashaei had been arrested and some summoned for questioning. Access to at least four pro-Mashaei websites was blocked last week. Analysts fear that Ahmadinejad might go out with all guns firing following Mashaei's disqualification. The president was reported to have cancelled three of his provincial visits this week to stay in the capital, Tehran.

Meanwhile, the Fars news agency, which is affiliated to the elite Revolutionary Guards, published a series of interviews with some leading clerics who called on people to respect the Guardian Council's decision.

Rafsanjani was a close confidant of Khamenei for much of the 1980s and 1990s but the pair fell out when the former lost to Ahmadinejad in the 2005 presidential vote. The rift between the two widened when Rafsanjani voiced moderate support for Iran's Green movement in 2009 while Khamenei stood firm by Ahmadinejad and denied any allegations of vote rigging.

Rafsanjani's last-minute entry in Iran's presidential race had revived hopes among the country's reformers for a change in the country's trajectory and infuriated hardliners who believed his candidacy would challenge Khamenei's authority.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    


Israel and Syria exchange fire in the Golan Heights


Syrian army says it destroyed 'Israeli vehicle with everyone in it', but Israel reports only minor damage and no injuries

A cross-border exchange of fire in the Golan Heights between the Israeli and Syrian armies early on Tuesday triggered a claim by the Damascus regime that a jeep manned by Israeli troops had entered Syrian territory and was destroyed.

The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) denied the claim, saying shots were deliberately fired at a patrol inside the Israeli-controlled the Golan Heights, causing minor damage and no injuries. "In response, IDF forces returned precise fire at the source and reported a direct hit," it said.

It was the latest in a string of cross-border incidents in recent months, which have raised concerns that the two-year-old civil war in Syria could spill over into the neighbouring Golan Heights, which Israel has occupied for more than 40 years.

Israel has also launched air strikes on weapons targets inside Syria three times since the start of the year, intensifying fears that the civil war could develop a regional dimension.

A statement from the Syrian army, published on the official Syrian Arab News Agency (Sana) about six hours after the shooting incident, said it had "destroyed an Israeli vehicle with everyone in it" that entered Syria.

It was the third time in four days that shots fired in Syria have crossed into the Israeli-occupied Golan, close to Israeli army outposts or patrols, according Israeli reports. There have been a further three occasions this month when mortar shells have landed in the Golan.

Until now, the IDF has maintained that such cross-border incidents are accidental, rather than aimed at its forces. However, Israel Radio quoted officials as saying that this week's gunfire was deliberately targeted at patrolling IDF troops.

The Israeli military chief of staff, Benny Gantz, warned that Israel risked being drawn into a "security deterioration in our region at any moment, a deterioration which could rapidly spin out of control".

Visiting the Golan on Tuesday, he added: "Not a day goes by when we are not faced with decisions which could lead us to a sudden and out-of-control deterioration. This is the situation that will accompany us in the near term and we need to be more alert because of it."

Israel has reinforced the fence along the border between the Golan Heights and Syria, and has increased its military patrols in the area.

According to a report in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, a large-scale "home front" security drill is to be held in the area on Wednesday. It quoted the mayor of Majdal Shams, the largest town in the Golan, populated mainly by Druze supportive of the Syrian regime, as saying there were no public shelters in the area and few residents have purpose-built safe areas at home.

"Only people who live in relatively new houses have a protected space in their homes," Dolan Abu Saleh told the paper. "The IDF recently hooked us up to the automatic warning system, and two weeks ago a siren sounded here in real time as a result of an incident that occurred near the border." Tension in the area was rising, he added.

Meanwhile a Syrian rebel seriously injured in fighting across the border was treated in the Ziv hospital in northern Israel. Israel Radio said the man had been brought initially to an IDF field hospital by Israeli soldiers. It did not explain how Israeli forces reached the injured man.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    


Iraqi sectarian attacks kill at least 86


In Iraq's deadliest day for eight months, 10 car bombs explode in Baghdad and other attacks hit Shia Basra and Sunni Samarra

A wave of attacks killed at least 86 people in Shia and Sunni areas of Iraq on Monday, pushing the death toll over the past week to more than 230 and extending one of the most sustained bouts of sectarian violence the country has seen in years.

The worst of the violence took place in Baghdad, where 10 car bombs ripped through open-air markets and other areas of Shia neighbourhoods, killing at least 48 people and wounding more than 150, police officials said.

In the bloodiest single attack, a parked car bomb blew up in a busy market in the northern Shia neighbourhood of Shaab, killing 14 and wounding 24.

The predominantly Shia city of Basra was hit by two car bombs, one outside a restaurant and another at the main bus station, killing at least 13 and wounded 40, according to officials.

In the town of Balad, a car bomb exploded next to a bus carrying Iranian pilgrims, killing 13 Iranians and one Iraqi, a police officer said.

The bloodshed is still far shy of the pace, scale and brutality of 2006-07, when Sunni and Shia militias carried out retaliatory attacks against each other. But Monday's attacks have heightened fears that the country could be turning back down the path towards civil war.

Sectarian tensions have been worsening since Iraq's minority Sunnis began protesting against what they say is mistreatment at the hands of the Shia-led government. The mass demonstrations, which began in December, have largely been peaceful, but the number of attacks rose sharply after a deadly security crackdown on a Sunni protest camp in northern Iraq on 23 April.

Monday was the deadliest day in Iraq in more than eight months. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attacks, but the fact that they occurred in Shia areas raised suspicions that Sunni militants were involved.

The prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, accused militant groups of trying to exploit Iraq's political instability to exacerbate sectarian tensions, and also blamed the spike in violence on the wider unrest in the region, particularly in Syria. He said insurgents "will not be able to bring back the atmosphere of the sectarian war".

Many Sunnis contend that much of the turmoil is rooted in decisions made by Maliki's government, saying his administration planted the seeds for more sectarian tension by becoming more aggressive towards Sunnis after the US military withdrawal in December 2011.

Monday's violence also struck Sunni areas, hitting the city of Samarra north of Baghdad and the western province of Anbar, a Sunni stronghold and the birthplace of the protest movement.

A parked car bomb in Samarra went off near a gathering of pro-government Sunni militia who were waiting outside a military base to receive salaries, killing three and wounding 13. In Anbar, gunmen ambushed two police patrols near the town of Haditha, killing eight policemen, police and army officials said.

Also in Anbar, authorities found 13 bodies dumped in a remote desert area, officials said. The victims, who included eight policemen kidnapped by gunmen on Friday, had been killed with gunshots to the head.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    


Abu Qatada to remain in prison until he returns to Jordan


Judge turns down cleric's bail request, saying he remains a threat to national security

The radical Islamist cleric Abu Qatada has been refused bail and will remain in Belmarsh high-security prison until he returns to Jordan to stand trial on terror charges, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) has ruled.

Mr Justice Irwin said Abu Qatada, who has been repeatedly detained as an international terror suspect in prison in Britain over the past 12 years, remained a threat to national security with a wide support network and could not be trusted not to abscond.

Abu Qatada informed the home secretary, Theresa May, earlier this month that he was willing to return voluntarily to Jordan after she reached a "fair trial" treaty with Jordan.

Siac was told that the British ambassador in Amman expected the Jordanian parliament to ratify the "mutual legal agreement" within weeks.

The decision to refuse bail follows evidence to Siac that jihadist material and videos produced by "the media wing of al-Qaida" were found on a USB stick during a police search of his north-west London home when he was on a 17-hour curfew in March. Police also found six illicit mobile phones and 55 rewriteable CDs/DVDs, in alleged breach of his bail conditions.

Abu Qatada's lawyers told Siac that he wanted to be released on 24-hour house arrest so that he could prepare to return with his family to Jordan.

Daniel Friedman, on behalf of Abu Qatada, said that for the first time in 12 years he felt safe in returning to Jordan and believed the new treaty, which forbids the use of evidence obtained by torture, could lead to him being cleared of terror charges dating back to bomb attacks in the late 1990s. It "substantially raises the prospect of acquittal in what we say are tainted charges", Friedman said.

Friedman added that Abu Qatada was a "proud and dignified" man, who had been held in custody for too long. He was first detained as an international terror suspect under emergency terrorism legislation in 2002.

His lawyers say he "has been deprived of his liberty more than any other non-convicted person in British history". Friedman said there had been six home secretaries, four presidents of Siac, and four pieces of anti-terrorism legislation since Abu Qatada was first detained, yet he had yet to be prosecuted for a crime in Britain.

He said the mobile phones, USB sticks and other devices belonged to his wife and children, and denied that he had used them or wanted to use them.

Robin Tam QC, for the home secretary, reminded the Siac judges that they had once described him as "a truly dangerous man" and said there "was no reason to believe that was no longer true".

He said there had been a "wholesale and wanton disregard" of the previous bail conditions, which included a ban on electronic communication equipment, by Abu Qatada and his family. "There were so many items found all over the house that there is no other inference than that the family were not taking this seriously," he said.

Tam denied that the process to bring the new treaty into force in Jordan could take months, saying that it was being introduced in the lower house of the parliament in Amman on Tuesday. This raises the prospect that Abu Qatada could be on a plane before the summer.

In his ruling, Irwin said: "There is no doubt about the national security threat which the appellant presents. The essence of that is the promulgation of his views in support of violence, and the potential effect of others of that promulgation."

He said that in the past Abu Qatada had gone into hiding in order to avoid a court order and equipped himself with a forged Portuguese passport.

"He is highly intelligent, has a range of sympathetic and supportive contacts, and his risk to national security is undiminished. We reject his submission that he can, even now, be relied on to comply with his legal obligations and not abscond."


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    


Hezbollah troops aid Syrian government advance on border town


Battle for Qusair believed to be edging in favour of loyalist forces, and role of Hezbollah marks new escalation in crisis

Syrian and Hezbollah troops have pushed deep into the strategic border town of Qusair after a ferocious artillery and mortar blitz that is thought to have killed more than 50 residents and laid bare the Lebanese militia’s direct support for the Assad regime.

The battle for the town, which lies at a crucial junction between Damascus and Homs, is believed to be edging in favour of loyalist forces who had hammered rebel-held areas with overwhelming firepower before launching a much-anticipated advance late on Saturday.

But rebels in Qusair insist they have not lost control of key areas and have vowed to withstand the advance of Hezbollah militants from the Lebanese border to the south and Syrian troops approaching from the north.

Qusair-based rebels are mainly a homegrown mix of civilians and army defectors. However, Jabhat al-Nusra, a group with links to al-Qaida, has gained both in prominence and numbers in recent months and is believed to be leading the defence of the southern outskirts where it is clashing directly with Hezbollah.

The fighting of the past 48 hours marks the first time in the Syrian civil war, or anywhere else, that Sunni al-Qaida and Shia Hezbollah have fought a direct and large-scale engagement. Members of both groups had clashed sporadically in other parts of the country over the past two years, often unknowingly. But the current confrontation breaks new ground in the conflict and sharply underlines the sectarian element of Syria’s war. President Bashar al-Assad is from the minority Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shia Islam.

Across the border in Lebanon, a hospital and medical clinics in the Hezbollah stronghold of the Bekaa valley, 10 miles from the fighting, were seeking blood donations to help treat wounded militants. Sources in the Beirut suburb of Daheyah, where the group’s command post is located, said wounded fighters had also been taken to hospitals there.

Activists in Qusair suggested up to 30 Hezbollah members may have been killed and dozens more injured. Those figures are impossible to verify.

What is clear is that Hezbollah’s prominent role marks yet another escalation in a crisis that continues to alarm the region and force a mass exodus of Syrian citizens into neighbouring states. The UN’s refugee agency (UNHCR) estimates that more than 1.5 million Syrians have fled to Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey. Up to several million more remain internally displaced.

Hezbollah, whose raison d’etre is ostensibly resistance against Israel, has shifted uncomfortably as the civil war has intensified. The group owes much to the strategic depth provided to it by the Assad regime, which offers a supply run, weapons depots, and a refuge for key figures.

Iran, the key patron of both groups, is also heavily invested. Hezbollah, over the past year in particular, has tried to condition its followers to the fact that it is fighting a war in a neighbouring Arab state, rather than the Israeli military.

“It isn’t even a secret any more,” said one 25-year-old resident of a Hezbollah enclave in Daheyah, who refused to be named. “There are dozens of martyrs coming home. I know of at least four myself. People are talking about it openly. They are even starting to use the main martyrs cemetery. They say that they died defending the Sit Zeinab mosque [an important Shia Islamic shrine in Damascus].”

Peter Harling, a senior adviser with the International Crisis Group, said the Lebanese group’s now open involvement was a landmark moment in the war. “The fact that Hezbollah has chosen to assume such an ostensible role changes the nature of the conflict generally,” he said. “It will suck Israel in, adding a new layer. It will further exacerbate the sectarian component of the struggle.

“Hezbollah’s direct involvement also transforms its rapport with Syrian society: the resulting animosity will discourage Hezbollah and Iran from considering any compromise that could weaken the power structure, which they now need more than ever. Finally, it shifts the definition of a possible regime victory, turning it into a triumph for its allies, which will be more difficult to accept for their enemies.”

If opposition groups are ousted from Qusair, loyalist forces will have control of a supply line from Damascus to Syria’s third city, Homs, which would allow the regime to consolidate in a part of the country it regards as a strategic corridor. Its core support bases in the nearby Alawite hinterland, which runs from near Homs towards Latakia and Tartus on the Mediterranean coast, have been exposed at times by rebel gains in the area.

A regime victory would also offer it an uncontested link to the northern Bekaa, where Hezbollah and surrounding Shia villages can offer ongoing support to loyalist forces.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    



Syria crisis: battle for Qusair – live updates


The Syrian army claims to have seized the strategic town of Qusair after reports that Hezbollah fighters helped it attack rebel positions


    


Islamists clash with police in Tunisia


Government banned annual rally of Ansar al-Sharia, which openly supports al-Qaida, saying it posed a threat to society

Supporters of the hardline Islamist group Ansar al-Sharia clashed with Tunisian police on Sunday after the government banned its annual rally, saying it posed a threat to society.

Ansar al-Sharia, which openly supports al-Qaida, is considered the most radical of the hardline Islamist groups to have emerged in Tunisia since the revolution in 2011 that overthrew the secular dictator Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali.

The annual rally, expected to have drawn tens of thousands of members, was due to have been held in the central city of Kairouan. Supporters there threw stones at police, who fired teargas in response, a witness said.

Police also prevented the group holding a smaller religious meeting in the Ettadamen district of Tunis on Sunday, prompting clashes with the Salafists who chanted "the rule of the tyrant should fall", another witness said. Police there fired teargas and shots into the air to disperse about 500 protesters who were throwing stones at officers.

Ansar al-Sharia said police had arrested its spokesman Saifeddine Rais. It was not immediately clear where or when he had been arrested, but a security source confirmed he had been detained.

The interior ministry said on Friday it had banned the gatherings of the group, "which has shown disdain for state institutions, incited violence against them and poses a threat to public security".

Hardline Islamist Salafists are seeking a broader role for religion in Tunisia, alarming the secular elite which fears their agenda is to impose strict views on people and compromise individual freedom, women's rights and democracy.

Tunisian police blamed a Salafist for the assassination of the secular opposition politician Chokri Belaid in February, which provoked the biggest street protests in Tunisia since the overthrow of Ben Ali.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    


EU decision to lift Syrian oil sanctions boosts jihadist groups


Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaida affiliate, consolidates position as scramble for control of wells accelerates

The EU decision to lift Syrian oil sanctions to aid the opposition has accelerated a scramble for control over wells and pipelines in rebel-held areas and helped consolidate the grip of jihadist groups over the country's key resources.

Jabhat al-Nusra, affiliated with al-Qaida and other extreme Islamist groups, control the majority of the oil wells in Deir Ezzor province, displacing local Sunni tribes, sometimes by force. They have also seized control of other fields from Kurdish groups further to the north-east, in al-Hasakah governorate.

As opposition groups have turned their guns on each other in the battle over oil, water and agricultural land, military pressure on Bashar al-Assad's government from the north and east has eased off. In some areas, al-Nusra has struck deals with government forces to allow the transfer of crude across the front lines to the Mediterranean coast.

As a result of the rush to make quick money, open-air refineries have been set up in Deir Ezzor and al-Raqqa provinces. Crude is stored in ditches and heated in metal tanks by wood fires, shrouding the region with plumes of black smoke, exposing the local population to the dangers of the thick smog and the frequent explosions at the improvised plants.

Heating oil, diesel and petrol is condensed in hoses running from the tanks through pools of water and sold across the north, as far as Aleppo. The remaining crude is shipped by road on tankers to Turkey.

One leading opposition figure said: "The northern front hasn't just gone dormant; the northern front has gone commercial."

The EU announced it was lifting its oil embargo in April to help the moderate opposition. The implementation regulations have yet to be issued so the decision has not taken effect, but regional experts say the announcement intensified the race for oil – a race the western-backed moderates lost.

Joshua Landis, an expert on the region at the University of Oklahoma who runs the Syria Comment blog, said the EU decision on oil "sent a message that oil could come back online faster than most thought possible".

"Whoever gets their hands on the oil, water and agriculture, holds Sunni Syria by the throat. At the moment, that's al-Nusra," Landis said. "Europe opening up the market for oil forced this issue. So the logical conclusion from this craziness is that Europe will be funding al-Qaida."

Abu Albara, an al-Nusra fighter who spoke to the Guardian by telephone from Deir Ezzor, said: "Now, we can say that most of the oil wells are in the hands of the rebels, only a single oil facility in Hasakah is still under the control of [Kurdish fighters]. There are two other oil wells close to the Iraqi borders in the desert. The Iraqi army have surrounded them with tanks but we do not know what they are doing with them."

The al-Nusra guerilla said the group was merely guarding the wells it captured, but the rival groups have accused the Islamists of asset-stripping them for quick money.

"Jabhat al-Nusra is investing in the Syrian economy to reinforce its position in Syria and Iraq. Al-Nusra fighters are selling everything that falls into their hands from wheat, archaeological relics, factory equipment, oil drilling and imaging machines, cars, spare parts and crude oil," Abu Saif, a fighter with the Ahrar Brigade, linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, told the Guardian by phone from the Deir Ezzor area.

"The Syrian regime itself is paying more than 150m Syrian lire [£1.4m] monthly to Jabhat al-Nusra to guarantee oil is kept pumping through two major oil pipelines in Banias and Latakia. Middlemen trusted by both sides are to facilitate the deal and transfer money to the organisation."

A western diplomat watching the situation said: "We understand that in Deir Ezzor, it's a bit of a mix. Al-Nusra is there and there is sometimes co-operation with the regime for practical reasons. In some areas oil products are being given to the local communities, but there are clear dangers in these kinds of open-air refineries."

The diplomat said the EU implementation regulation for the lifting of the oil embargo would include safeguard clauses that would give the western-backed opposition, the National Coalition, the power to authorise exports. But as things stand, the coalition and its allies hold very little of Syria's oil wealth in their hands.

A former Syrian oil executive in the rebel-held areas said: "In the last few months, they seem to have figured a way to sell the oil supply across the lines from the rebels to government forces, through intermediaries trusted on both sides."

The former executive said the oil trade had spawned a growing demand for oil tanker lorries, as a single shipment could earn a profit of up to $10,000 (£6,600). He added that al-Nusra and other jihadist groups were using much of the money to win hearts and minds in areas they have captured, such as al-Raqqa city, which fell in March.

"If you look at what the money does in these places," he said, asking for his name not to be used because of the sensitivity of the issue. "It doesn't take a rocket scientist. You bring in flour, you repair the bakeries, so there are big smiles in the local community. It's an incredible marketing machine."

In April, the head of the western-backed rebel Supreme Military Council, General Selim Idriss, pledged to create a force to secure the oilfields and other economic resources in Deir Ezzor, al-Hasakah and Raqqa provinces, but that force has yet to materialise and observers doubt Idriss has the money, manpower or weaponry to displace the jihadists.

"Idriss probably felt he had to say that, to reassure the Europeans," Landis said. "But nobody takes such claims seriously. Where is he going to get 30,000 men from?"

The only rivals to the power of the jihadists in the oil region are the Kurds in al-Hasakah, and the Sunni tribes around Deir Ezzor, who have found themselves increasingly marginalised by Islamic extremists.

In one well-documented case, fighting broke out in the village of al-Musareb, near Deir Ezzor, between al-Nusra fighters and local tribesmen over ownership of an oil tanker. The al-Nusra commander, a Saudi called Qasura al-Jazrawi, was killed. As a reprisal, the jihadist group levelled much of the village and executed 50 of its residents.

Apart from the latest round of conflict the oil rush has triggered, human rights campaigners have raised concerns about the health impact of the wildcat refining industry. Skin and breathing complaints have become common while there are reports of workers on the improvised oil fields, including children, being burned to death in accidents.

An opposition activist in Hasakah, Salman Kurdi, said: "They refine oil by boiling it to very high temperatures by using gas cans, and most of the time, they blow up. It's killed many of the people who work there.

"A month ago, an explosion happened in an oil well called Shadada, in the countryside south of here, and five people were killed. They dig a big hole and put lots of fire in it and gas to make it boiling. If you travel south to the countryside, you can spot the smoke rising every few kilometres."


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    

Gunmen kill anti-terror policeman and family as Iraq violence continues


Eight policemen abducted on highway to Jordan and Syria, following three days of violence that killed 130 people

A string of attacks killed at least 16 people in Iraq on Saturday while gunmen abducted eight policemen guarding a post on the country's main highway to Jordan and Syria, as a wave of violence continued to grip the country.

The shootings and bombings follow three days of attacks that killed 130 people in both Shiite and Sunni areas in scenes reminiscent of retaliatory attacks between the two groups that pushed the country to the brink of civil war in 2006 and 2007. The spike in bloodshed in recent weeks has raised fears the country may be heading toward a new round of sectarian conflict.

Tensions have been worsening since Iraq's minority Sunnis began protesting what they say is mistreatment at the hands of the Shiite-led government, including random detentions and neglect. The mass demonstrations, which began in December, have largely been peaceful, but the number of attacks rose sharply after a deadly security crackdown on a Sunni protest camp in northern Iraq on 23 April.

Majority Shiites control the levers of power in post-Saddam Hussein Iraq. Wishing to rebuild the nation rather than revert to open warfare, they have largely restrained their militias in the past five years or so as Sunni extremist groups such as al-Qaida have frequently targeted them with large-scale attacks. But the sharp jump in attacks on Sunni areas, including bombings on Friday that killed at least 76 people, has fueled concerns of renewed retaliatory killings.

In Saturday's deadliest attack, gunmen broke into the house of an anti-terrorism police captain in the southern suburbs of Baghdad, killing the officer and his family in their sleep. Police officials identified the dead as Captain Adnan Ibrahim, his wife and two children, aged eight and 10. The attackers fled the scene, and killed another policeman who tried to stop them at a nearby checkpoint.

In the western Sunni province of Anbar, gunmen kidnapped eight policemen who were guarding a post on the main highway linking Iraq to both Jordan and Syria, according to two police officials.

Earlier in the day, security forces and gunmen clashed in the area after police tried to arrest a Sunni tribal sheik suspected of being behind the killing of three army intelligence soldiers who were stopped by gunmen near a protest site in the city of Ramadi last month. Iraqi authorities had offered a bounty for the arrest or information leading to the arrest of the sheik, Khamis Abu Risha, and two other people they say were linked to the killings.

The fighting near Abu Risha's house north of Ramadi left three people wounded. No arrests were made. Later, gunmen deployed near the main entrance of Anbar Operations Command headquarters in Ramadi, 70 miles west of Baghdad. Hours later, Ramadi police said a bomb placed under stalls in a small stadium exploded, killing four people who were watching a local soccer match.

Shortly before sunset, a car bomb went off near a small market in in the town of Latifiyah south of Baghdad, killing three people and wounding 12. In the predominantly Shiite city of Basra in southern Iraq, gunmen shot and killed a Sunni cleric, Assad Nassir, as he was leaving his house, police said. Two Iraqi soldiers were also killed and two others wounded when a roadside bomb struck a group of soldiers arriving to inspect the scene of a blast that took place earlier in the northern city of Mosul. A security official said a roadside bomb hit a police patrol in the northern suburbs of Baghdad, killing one policeman and wounding two others.

Health officials confirmed the death tolls. All officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to talk to the media.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds